Helping The Injured Since 1966
Individuals can feel rather small and insignificant when standing up against a large company. However, this should not deter you from taking action to protect yourself after suffering harm from a company’s product or an incident caused by a company. Often, your harm...
If you have been harmed by a defective product, a dangerous drug or a negligent corporation, you may wonder what legal options you have to seek compensation. Depending on the nature and extent of your injury, and how many other people are in a similar situation, you...
Many parents of premature infants who were fed cow’s milk-based baby formulas in the hospital have filed lawsuits against the manufacturers of these products. The primary defendants are Abbott Laboratories and Mead Johnson, which produce Similac and Enfamil brands,...
In the past, premature infants would be fed certain prescription baby formulas in the hospital meant to help them thrive. These formulas were developed and manufactured by the companies that produce Similac and Enfamil products. Unfortunately, some of these formulas...
We are very happy to announce that we can FINALLY move forward on the AMENDED SETTLEMENT in the Easy Heat case. For full details on the Amended Settlement, please visit our Easy Heat Settlement website at www.easyheatsettlement.com. ACTION: Easy Heat Inc. manufactures and sells a radiant heating system that was designed to be installed in or under floors. In the…
In our consumer-driven society, we are constantly bombarded with the latest innovations. Many times, however, products that come onto the market are not safe and may even result in injury or death. This can be a confusing and disturbing experience for consumers who expect consumer protections to keep them safe or for products on the market to function as advertised.…
AT&T has agreed to a settlement of a class action brought by landowners who own land under to the railroad right-of-way. Fiber optic companies, including AT&T, buried fiber optic cable in the railroad right-of-way. In this case, the landowners argued that they own the subsurface rights adjacent to the railroad right-of-way and should be compensated by AT&T, and other fiber…